Stop hiring discrimination against the unemployed? “Indeed” we can!

By David Elliot

Indeed.com, reportedly the largest job listing website in the U.S., has announced it will stop posting job ads that refuse applications from unemployed candidates.

Earlier this summer, USAction launched an online petition drive to outlaw hiring discrimination against the unemployed. Although we were the first to launch an online drive, we weren’t the first to document this egregious practice. That distinction goes to our friends over at the National Employment Law Project, which released a report showing that employers of all sizes and staffing agencies are using recruitment and hiring policies that expressly deny employment to the unemployed – simply because they are not working.

The NELP study reviewed job postings that appeared on four of the nation’s most prominent online job listing websites: CareerBuilder.com, Monster.com, Indeed.com and Craigslist. NELP identified more than 150 ads that openly discriminated based on employment status. The overwhelming majority of the discriminatory ads required that applicants “must be currently employed.”

After the NELP study was released and widely distributed, USAction’s petition drive targeted companies like Monster.com and CareerBuilder.com and asked them to stop posting ads that discriminate against the unemployed. Later, Change.org, CREDO Action and ColorofChange.org launched their own petition drives, and together we’ve gathered more than 243,000 signatures!

At first, we didn’t get the answer we wanted, although Monster.com did help generate some publicity by sending us a “cease and desist” letter.

But now, momentum is growing against hiring discrimination. Legislation is pending in both chambers of Congress and has been introduced in several states. Late last month, President Obama endorsed the legislation during an appearance on the Tom Joyner Show.

And with Indeed.com’s announcement this week, the good news continues. The company’s announcement was first reported by Change.org:

“Indeed.com strives to provide the best job search experience for job seekers,” said Indeed.com Communications Director Sophie Beaupere. “Our policy is to exclude job listings that do not comply with federal or local laws related to discriminatory hiring practices as well as job listings that discriminate against the unemployed.”

So what’s next? USAction realizes that even if the practice of employment discrimination ended today, we still would not have enough jobs in our country for the almost 14 million unemployed and 25 million un- or under-employed Americans who want them. That’s why USAction is ratcheting up its “Good Jobs for Everyone in America” campaign, which calls for ending hiring discrimination, extending federal unemployment insurance beyond 2011 and passing robust jobs legislation like Rep. Jan Schakowsky’s Emergency Jobs to Restore the American Dream Act, which would create two million public-sector jobs over the next two years.

David Elliot is the Communications Director USAction / USAction Education Fund.

Verizon Strike is About All of Our Economic Futures

By Richard Kirsch

Cross-posted at NewDeal2.0.

For now, Verizon’s striking workers are back on the job. A two-week walk-out by 45,000 Communications Workers of America (CWA) and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) members from Massachusetts to Virginia led to Verizon finally agreeing to seriously engage the unions at the bargaining table. But the tough bargaining is just beginning. The issues at hand are about more than just a labor dispute — they are at the heart of the problems facing our economy.

So what about the rich getting richer while average Americans tread water? The Chairman of Verizon, Ivan Seidenberg, made $18 million last year, 300 times that of the average worker (see Verizon proxy statements). Verizon made $3 billion in profits for the first half of this year alone and $22.5 billion in the past four years. Still, the company is asking its workers for $1 billion in annual concessions, which work out to about $20,000 a worker. Verizon’s list includes cuts in pensions, holidays, sick leaves, and benefits for workers injured on the job. The company is asking workers to pay thousands of dollars more for health care each year, while Seidenberg and his wife get free health care for life.

Corporate America is doing fine while paying fewer taxes at home and shipping jobs overseas. Verizon got corporate tax refunds from the IRS totaling $1.3 billion in 2009 and 2010, years in which it made $7.5 billion. Verizon has outsourced thousands of jobs and is asking in the new contract for provisions that would make that outsourcing even easier.

Unions are a shrinking part of the American work force, leading to lower wages and benefits. CWA and IBEW represent Verizon’s landline business. Despite repeated attempts to unionize Verizon, only 70 Verizon wireless workers belong to a union. One bright spot is that the unionized members of Verizon are also installing the company’s FiOS product, which delivers cable television and Internet. But Verizon is competing with big, non-unionized cable companies like Time Warner and ComCast, where wages and benefits are significantly lower. There is better news in the broader wireless industry, where 40,000 employees of AT&T wireless are unionized. But that represents about one-third of the industry, whereas virtually the entire landline business is unionized.

Is new efficient technology replacing the old and displacing jobs? Verizon wants to make it seem like its unionized landline workers are working for a dying technology. But much of what we think of as new technology relies on the landlines installed and maintained by Verizon’s unionized workers. Did you realize that your wireless signal actually goes through landlines that carry it from a cell tower? Or that when you use Skype or make a call on Gmail that they are carried by landlines? Severe limits on available spectrum force wireless companies to constantly find new ways to transmit signals over wired connections.

Where did Verizon get the funds to start Verizon Wireless? From the cash generated by its traditional landline business. But while Verizon shareholders continue to reap the benefits of that investment, Verizon wants to stop the landline workers from sharing in the returns.

In short, what’s at stake in the labor dispute between Verizon and its unions are the middle class jobs that drive the economy but are fast disappearing. It’s not a surprise that Verizon’s Chairman, Seidenberg, is also the Chairman of the Business Roundtable, the organization that represents the CEOs of America’s biggest companies. Verizon is working hard in its proposed contract to keep up with all the corporate Joneses that have reaped record profits by cutting wages and benefits, shipping jobs overseas, and legally bribing Congress to create huge loopholes in the corporate tax code.

In two weeks we will mark the tenth anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center. Will we remember that in the days following the catastrophe, Verizon technicians resurrected the entire communications infrastructure of lower Manhattan, allowing the stock market and world financial markets to resume business with barely a hitch? In the last decade, Wall Street did great — even after crashing the economy and getting government bailouts. It’s the Main Street workers who kept the Wall Street infrastructure going who remain under attack, just as our entire economy remains under attack by companies like Verizon that would destroy middle class jobs in the United States to protect their multi-millionaire CEOs and corporate shareholders.

Next time you pick up your telephone, remember that the fight that Verizon’s workers will continue to wage with the company over their contracts in the coming weeks and months is not just about whether the men and woman who make that call possible will continue to hold decent jobs that provide security for their families. It’s about whether one more middle class engine of America’s puttering economy will be wrecked.

Richard Kirsch is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute and a Senior Adviser to USAction, whose book on the campaign to win reform will be published in 2012. He was National Campaign Manager of Health Care for America Now during the legislative battle to pass reform.

August Recess Photos: “Where are the jobs?”

Millions out of work. 16.1 percent of America un- or under-employed. And Congress is talking about attacks on America’s safety net!?!?

Across the country, USAction affiliates and partners are rallying for jobs, hosting roundtable discussions on economic security, challenging “tea party” members of Congress, protesting attacks on Medicare and Medicaid and asking a question that is simple yet fundamental to the future of our country:Where are the jobs?

Check out the whole photo album here: http://j.mp/qvb8i9

HuffPost Politics Reports on Monster.com “Cease and Desist” Letter to USAction

Huffington Post’s Jordan Howard reportshttp://j.mp/oklPsI

Monster.com Says It Won’t Ban Third-Party Ads That Discourage Job Applications From The Unemployed

WASHINGTON — The parent company for the employment website Monster.com, Monster Worldwide Inc., is taking action to get the progressive advocacy group USAction to stop its online campaign aimed at companies whose job postings discourage the unemployed from applying.

In July, USAction began circulating an online petition imploring employment websites such as Monster.com and Careerbuilder.com to reject ads from third-party employers that require applicants to be “currently employed.” As employment websites, Monster and Careerbuilder don’t actually post the ads, but do allow them to be up on the site.

USAction began collecting signatures online — it now has about 26,000 — and put a petition letter on the progressive website Dailykos.com. The group also launched an ad campaign on Facebook.

Then late last Friday, USAction received a “cease and desist” letter from Monster.com claiming the information in the campaign is false, misleading and defamatory. “Monster.com does not engage in any discrimination in hiring,” the letter said. “Monster.com is the media for third-party employers that post their jobs directly onto the monster.com website without input or editorial contribution from Monster.”

USAction spokesman David Elliot said USAction would not cease nor desist.

“Saying they don’t discriminate against the unemployed in hiring is kind of a technicality without a moral distinction,” he told The Huffington Post. “They may not, themselves, discriminate in terms of the people they hire at Monster.com, but they’re still running these ads. So we’re going to keep continuing, we’re not going to cease and desist when it comes to telling the world about this unfair and outrageous practice, a practice that should in fact be illegal.”

Continue…

ACTION: Join those 26,000 Americans and tell Monster.com and all employment sites to “cease and desist” accepting ads that exclude unemployed job-seekers! 

No, we will not “cease and desist” telling people about hiring discrimination against the unemployed.

Two weeks ago, we launched a campaign to end hiring discrimination against unemployed Americans.

Specifically, our online petition campaign aimed at companies that refuse to consider hiring unemployed workers, a perverse form of discrimination in today’s economy.

So far, more than 26,000 Americans have signed our petition.

But someone – or perhaps in this era of “corporatehood vs. personhood” I should say some thing – wants us to go away.

That would be monster.com.

You see, when we launched our campaign, one of the steps we took was to ask the executives at monster.com and careerbuilder.com to stop posting help-wanted ads that expressly deny employment to the unemployed – simply because they are not working.

A recent study by the National Employment Law Project found that employers of all sizes as well as staffing agencies are using recruitment and hiring policies that expressly deny employment to the unemployed. The NELP study identified more than 150 ads that openly discriminate based on employment status. NELP examined ads posted on careerbuilder.com, monster.com and two other online job posting firms. It found that the overwhelming majority of the discriminatory ads required that applicants “must be currently employed.”

We complained.

Along with our petition drive, we launched a modest Facebook ad campaign, asking careerbuilder.com and monster.com to stop the discrimination.

Monster.com complained back.

They sent us a “cease and desist” letter, demanding that we stop mentioning them in our campaign. The point they were trying to make, I think, is that although they may, from time to time, post ads that are discriminatory, they don’t themselves discriminate in their hiring practices, and they counsel employers against discrimination.

Their first point strikes me as a claim without a moral distinction. If they don’t discriminate in their hiring practices, good for them. But they do accept money to post ads from other companies that discriminate.

Their second point – that they counsel employers against discrimination – came to light after they were called out in an investigative piece in The New York Times. Their response.

USAction will not “cease and desist” telling the world about hiring discrimination against the unemployed, about companies that engage in this practice, and about online job posting firms that enable it.

And that includes Monster.com

David Elliot
Communications Director
USAction 

Monster.com responds. Will they refuse ads that discriminate against unemployed workers?

Monster.com responded to our campaign and Act.ly petition to end discrimination by employees against unemployed workers. Monster.com claims to “strongly oppose discriminating vs. the unemployed”.

Thanks to Monster.com for responding and being willing to engage those who’ve signed on to our Act.ly petition asking them to refuse the ads of these companies.

But the question remains, if Monster.com “strongly opposes” discrimination, will they do the right thing and refuse ads from employers who openly do so?

We hope so.

If you do too, please sign the letter asking Monster.com and other major employment sites to REFUSE ads of employers who openly discriminate against unemployed Americans. 

Sign here: http://j.mp/nQNoDi

In the middle of a global economic recession, millions of people are unemployed for reasons they cannot control. Now we’ve learned that many companies are specifying in job advertisements that unemployed people cannot apply for open positions.

This is more than unfair to workers — it is devastating, and we urge you to refuse any such advertisements.

For Americans to get back on their feet, they can’t be chained to their involuntary status of unemployment. Please do your part in helping Americans get back to work

Stop the Big Oil bailouts!

Oil companies are making record profits, and with gas prices at $4 a gallon and higher, there’s no excuse to give them billions more in taxpayer subsidies and bailouts.

The Senate will vote next Tuesday on ending billions in subsidies to Big Oil. The bill would would eliminate more than $20 billion – over the next 10 years –  in tax breaks and subsidies for the five biggest oil companies on the planet (BP, Exxon, Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips).

Take action and tell your Senators to end taxpayer handouts to oil companies that just posted massive profits.

In just the last 3 months, the Big 5 oil companies reported more than $30 billion in profit.  In the last decade, they’ve made more than a trillion dollars in net profits. The oil industry doesn’t need more of  our money. (TP)

Click here to Stop the Big Oil Bailouts.

Make BP Pay!

Just over one year ago, on April 20, 2010, BP’s oil began to pour into the Gulf of Mexico. It did not stop for 87 days.

Today, economic and environmental devastation remain. Thousands of Gulf Coast residents cope with massive health problems from oil and toxic dispersants.

BP, on the other hand, just scored a nearly $10 billion dollar credit on their 2010 federal tax return, by writing off their “losses” incurred from the tragedy.2

That’s the equivalent of the entire annual budget of the EPA, whose funding was just slashed in the continuing resolution. It is almost one third of all the cuts in the continuing resolution.

Americans shouldn’t have to endure massive budget cuts because BP took a $10 billion tax deduction for destroying our gulf. Tell BP: Amend your tax return and pay your fair share.

Responding to BP’s monumental catastrophe cost a massive amount of resources from local, state and federal governments. Now, BP is dealing another massive blow to our nation’s tax revenue.

The $10 billion savings comes after BP wrote-off the $32.2 billion it set aside to cover clean-up costs, fines, and a $20 billion victim compensation fund (which has been notoriously slow and stingy in responding to claims, paying out less than 4 billion so far.3)

But there is an excellent precedent that says BP did not have to deduct these costs for tax advantages. Last year, Goldman Sachs waived a tax deduction it could have claimed as a result of paying $500 million in fines to the Securities and Exchange Commission for giving bad information to mortgage investors.4

BP has cost our nation enough already. It shouldn’t be rewarding itself with huge tax savings.  TAKE ACTION: http://bit.ly/dWEbrP

BP’s $10 billion tax credit slashes its liability by one third – at every US taxpayer’s expense. Tell BP to amend their tax return and pay their fair share.

Over the weekend, hundreds of Gulf Coast residents attended the Powershift conference in Washington, DC and told stories of oil still remaining on beaches, of its smell still permeating the air, of legions of dead dolphin, turtles and fish, of neighbors who are sick or jobless. They said that BP hasn’t done nearly enough to make it right.

Meanwhile in Washington, BP just restarted political contributions5 to the Republicans who continue to push for expanded offshore drilling, oppose lifting oil spill liability caps,6 and do everything in their power to keep our nation addicted to dirty crude, as millions of Americans literally drain their paychecks into their gas tanks every day.

To take our nation off of dirty, dangerous, expensive fossil fuels, we must force polluters to pay for the damage they do.

One year ago, BP brought us what would become the worst environmental disaster in our nation’s history. We don’t owe BP a tax-credit. BP owes us our gulf back. The least it could do is pay its fair share.

Please sign the petition now.

1. “BP To Cut Tax Bill By $13B But Won’t Say What It’s Paying IRS For 2010,” Talking Points Memo, April 20, 2011
2. “BP Scores $10B Tax Credit by Offsetting Cash,” CBS News, July 27, 2010
3. “Gulf-Spill Fund Pays $3.8 Billion; Total May Be ‘Higher’,” Bloomberg, April 18, 2011
4. “Goldman Waives Tax Deduction on SEC Settlement,” Bloomberg, July 16, 2011
5. “A year after spill, BP gives political contributions to GOP leaders,” The Hill, April 19, 2011
6. “A Year After Gulf Tragedy, Offshore Oil Companies Still Shielded by Liability Limits,” ProPublica, April 19, 2011